Glossar Begriffe

Glossar der Begriffe des Personalmanagements und der Sozialleistungen für Arbeitnehmer

Inhaltsübersicht

Employee Performance Evaluation

Employee performance evaluation is a key function of human resource management. It is important to note that for the evaluation to be effective, it should be fair, transparent, and consistent, with clear communication between the evaluator and the employee. This helps in maintaining a positive work environment and fostering professional growth.

What is an employee performance evaluation?

An employee performance evaluation is a systematic process where an organization assesses an employee’s work performance over a specific period. It involves setting clear performance expectations, monitoring progress, providing feedback, and identifying areas for improvement and professional development.

Hören Sie Ihren Mitarbeitern zu, erkennen Sie sie an, belohnen Sie sie und binden Sie sie an sich - mit unserer Employee Engagement Software

Who conducts the employee performance evaluation?

The specific individuals involved in the process can vary based on the organization's structure, size, and the level of formality in its performance management system. Here are the key participants:

‍

Immediate supervisor/manager: The primary responsibility for conducting performance evaluations usually lies with the employee's immediate supervisor or manager. This individual has direct oversight of the employee's day-to-day work, making them well-positioned to provide detailed insights into the employee's performance.
Higher-level managers or executives: In larger organizations or those with a more hierarchical structure, higher-level managers or executives may also be involved in the performance evaluation process. They may review evaluations conducted by lower-level managers to ensure consistency, fairness, and alignment with organizational goals.
Human resources department: The HR department often plays a supporting role in the performance evaluation process. HR professionals may assist in designing evaluation forms, providing training to managers, ensuring compliance with company policies, and maintaining records.

They may also be involved in facilitating discussions about career development, training opportunities, and addressing employee concerns.
Peers and subordinates (360-Degree Feedback): Some organizations implement a 360-degree feedback approach, where feedback is collected from various sources, including peers, subordinates, and even external stakeholders. In such cases, input from colleagues who work closely with the employee provides a more comprehensive and well-rounded view of their performance.
Self-evaluation by the employee: Many performance evaluation processes include a self-assessment component where employees have the opportunity to reflect on their own performance, accomplishments, and areas for improvement. This self-evaluation can serve as a starting point for discussions during the formal performance review meeting.
Collaborative approach: In modern performance management practices, there is a trend toward a more collaborative and continuous feedback approach. Instead of relying solely on an annual or semi-annual review, ongoing feedback and discussions between employees and managers are encouraged. This promotes real-time adjustments and facilitates a more dynamic and responsive performance management process.

What are the key components of an effective employee performance evaluation?

The key components of a well-rounded performance evaluation typically include:

‍

Clear performance goals and expectations: Clearly defined and communicated performance goals and expectations provide a foundation for evaluation. Employees should understand what is expected of them in terms of job responsibilities, objectives, and key performance indicators (KPIs).
Objective criteria and metrics: Performance evaluations should be based on objective criteria and measurable metrics whenever possible. Using quantifiable data helps eliminate subjectivity and ensures that assessments are grounded in tangible evidence of performance.
Regular and timely feedback: Regular feedback throughout the evaluation period is essential. Employees benefit from ongoing communication about their performance, allowing them to make timely adjustments and improvements. This can be achieved through regular check-ins and informal discussions.
Self-assessment: Including a self-assessment component allows employees to reflect on their own performance, achievements, and areas for improvement. This self-reflection can serve as a valuable starting point for the formal evaluation discussion.
Behavioral competencies: Assessing not only what an employee achieves but also how they achieve it is crucial. Evaluating behavioral competencies such as teamwork, communication, adaptability, and leadership provides a more holistic view of an employee's overall effectiveness.
Accomplishments and contributions: Recognition of an employee's accomplishments and contributions to the team or organization is a key component. Highlighting specific achievements helps reinforce positive behavior and motivates employees to continue performing at a high level.
Areas for improvement: Identifying areas for improvement is a constructive aspect of performance evaluations. Managers should provide clear, specific feedback on aspects that need development and work collaboratively with employees to create action plans for improvement.
Career development and training needs: Discussing an employee's career goals and development aspirations is crucial for long-term engagement and retention. Identifying training needs and opportunities for skill enhancement contributes to the employee's professional growth.
Recognition and rewards: Recognizing and rewarding outstanding performance is a motivational factor. Whether through formal awards, praise, or additional responsibilities, acknowledging exceptional contributions reinforces a positive work culture.
Documentation: Thorough documentation of the evaluation process is important for legal and organizational purposes. Records should include specific examples, feedback, and any agreed-upon development plans. This documentation serves as a reference for future evaluations and can be crucial in performance-related decisions.
Constructive communication: The communication style during the performance evaluation is crucial. Managers should use a constructive and supportive approach, fostering an open dialogue that encourages employees to share their perspectives and concerns.
Goal setting for the future: Looking forward, performance evaluations should involve setting clear goals for the future. Establishing realistic and challenging objectives helps employees stay focused and aligned with organizational priorities.
Fair and consistent application: The evaluation process should be fair and consistent across all employees. Avoiding bias and ensuring that similar performance standards are applied to everyone contributes to the credibility and effectiveness of the performance management system.

How often is employee performance evaluation conducted?

Here are some common frequencies for employee performance evaluations:

‍

Annual evaluations: Annual performance evaluations are a traditional and still widely practiced approach. These typically occur once a year, providing a comprehensive review of an employee's performance over the preceding 12 months.

Annual evaluations often involve a formal meeting between the employee and their supervisor to discuss goals, achievements, areas for improvement, and career development.
Semi-annual evaluations: Some organizations opt for a semi-annual performance review cycle. This approach allows for more frequent check-ins and adjustments to performance goals. Semi-annual evaluations are often preferred in fast-paced environments where goals and priorities may shift more rapidly.
Quarterly evaluations: Quarterly performance evaluations provide an even more frequent assessment of an employee's performance. This approach is common in industries or roles where rapid changes occur, and regular feedback is crucial for adapting to evolving circumstances.
Continuous feedback: A growing trend in performance management is the adoption of continuous feedback models. Instead of relying on formal evaluations at set intervals, managers provide ongoing feedback throughout the year. This approach allows for real-time adjustments, coaching, and recognition, fostering a more dynamic and responsive performance management process.
Project-based evaluations: In some project-based or team-oriented environments, evaluations may be tied to the completion of specific projects or milestones. This approach allows for a more targeted assessment of performance related to project goals and deliverables.
Probationary period evaluations: During an employee's initial probationary period, which is often the first few months of employment, organizations may conduct more frequent evaluations to assess the employee's suitability for the role and to provide early feedback on performance.

Umfragen zum Puls der Mitarbeiter:

Es handelt sich um kurze Umfragen, die häufig verschickt werden können, um schnell zu erfahren, was Ihre Mitarbeiter über ein Thema denken. Die Umfrage umfasst weniger Fragen (nicht mehr als 10), um die Informationen schnell zu erhalten. Sie können in regelmäßigen Abständen durchgeführt werden (monatlich/wöchentlich/vierteljährlich).

Treffen unter vier Augen:

Regelmäßige, einstündige Treffen für ein informelles Gespräch mit jedem Teammitglied sind eine hervorragende Möglichkeit, ein echtes Gefühl dafür zu bekommen, was mit ihnen passiert. Da es sich um ein sicheres und privates Gespräch handelt, können Sie so mehr Details über ein Problem erfahren.

eNPS:

Der eNPS (Employee Net Promoter Score) ist eine der einfachsten, aber effektivsten Methoden, um die Meinung Ihrer Mitarbeiter über Ihr Unternehmen zu ermitteln. Er enthält eine interessante Frage, die die Loyalität misst. Ein Beispiel für eNPS-Fragen sind: Wie wahrscheinlich ist es, dass Sie unser Unternehmen weiter empfehlen? Die Mitarbeiter beantworten die eNPS-Umfrage auf einer Skala von 1 bis 10, wobei 10 bedeutet, dass sie das Unternehmen mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit weiterempfehlen würden, und 1 bedeutet, dass sie es mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit nicht weiterempfehlen würden.

Anhand der Antworten können die Arbeitnehmer in drei verschiedene Kategorien eingeteilt werden:

Projektträger
Mitarbeiter, die positiv geantwortet oder zugestimmt haben.
Kritiker
Mitarbeiter, die sich negativ geäußert haben oder nicht einverstanden waren.
Passive
Mitarbeiter, die sich bei ihren Antworten neutral verhalten haben.

Entdecken Sie, wie Empuls Ihrer Organisation helfen kann

Branchenführende Engagement- und Anerkennungsplattform

Hype-Zyklus für HR-Technologie, 2023
Hype-Zyklus für Hybridarbeit, 2023
Marktführer für Voice of the Employee Solutions™ 2023
Einblick in die Innovation: Digitale Technologien treiben DEI-Ergebnisse 2023 voran

Forrester Landschaft der Mitarbeiteranerkennung, Q1 2023